Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has delivered a significant ruling concerning Muslim marriages solemnised under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 (SMA). The court clarified that once a marriage is governed by the Special Marriage Act, its statutory conditions cannot be bypassed by relying on Muslim personal law.
The case involved a Muslim man who entered into a second marriage while his first marriage was still subsisting. The issue before the court was whether the second marriage could receive legal validity under the Special Marriage Act.
The High Court referred to Section 4 of the Special Marriage Act, which requires that neither party should have a living spouse at the time of marriage. The court held that this statutory condition has to be followed irrespective of the personal law applicable to the individual.
The ruling is significant because Muslim personal law may permit a Muslim man to have more than one wife in certain circumstances. However, the court made it clear that such personal-law provisions cannot be used to override the mandatory requirements of the Special Marriage Act when a person chooses to marry under that legislation.
The judgment has therefore triggered wider discussion on the relationship between personal laws and secular marriage legislation in India. Importantly, the ruling should not be interpreted as saying that Sharia law automatically governs every Muslim marriage registered under the Special Marriage Act. Rather, it reinforces the principle that marriages under the SMA must comply with the conditions prescribed by that law.
Comments
Sign in with Google to comment.